« BACK TO HUB
THE KNOX-KEENE ACT

The California law that gives Medi-Cal members enforceable rights — and the one health plans hope you never read.

What Is the Knox-Keene Act?

California Health & Safety Code §§ 1340–1399.818

The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 is California's primary law governing managed care health plans — including Medi-Cal plans like L.A. Care, Anthem Blue Cross, and Molina Healthcare. It is enforced by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC).

Knox-Keene is not a suggestion. It is a legally binding framework that tells health plans exactly what they must do, when they must do it, and what happens when they don't. A willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act is a crime under California law.

Most Medi-Cal members never know this law exists. That is not an accident.

This page documents the most critical rights Knox-Keene gives you as a Medi-Cal member — in plain language, with the actual statutory citations, so you can use them.

§ 1368.01(b) | YOUR MOST POWERFUL RIGHT

The 72-Hour Expedited Hearing Rule

"Imminent threat. 72 hours. No exceptions."

If your health condition presents an imminent and serious threat to your health — including severe pain, potential loss of life, loss of limb, or loss of major bodily function — your health plan is legally required to resolve your grievance on an expedited basis.

Under Health & Safety Code § 1368.01(b) and 28 CCR § 1300.68.01, the plan must inform you and the DMHC in writing of their expedited review decision — or its pending status — no later than 72 hours after receiving your grievance.

Note on Urgent Care: While most expedited grievances are 72 hours, the standard for urgent care appointments is 48 hours if no prior authorization is required, and 96 hours if prior authorization is required.

The 72-hour clock starts the moment the plan receives notice. Not when they get around to processing it. Not when a supervisor reviews it. The moment it is received.

What triggers this right: Severe pain. Risk of permanent disability. Life-threatening conditions. Situations where waiting 30 days for a standard grievance response would cause irreversible harm.

What the plan must do: Issue a written decision or written acknowledgment of pending status — to both you and the DMHC — within 72 hours. Silence is a violation.

§ 1368.01(a) | STANDARD GRIEVANCES

The 30-Day Standard Grievance Rule

"Every complaint. Every time. 30 days."

For grievances that are not time-critical, your health plan has 30 calendar days from receipt to resolve your complaint in writing. This is not a target. It is a legal ceiling.

Under Health & Safety Code § 1368.01(a) and 28 CCR § 1300.68(a), the plan's grievance system must receive, review, and resolve grievances within 30 calendar days. Every health plan is required to have a grievance process and to inform members about it. If your plan fails to respond within 30 days, that failure is itself a violation — and opens the door to DMHC complaint and Independent Medical Review.

Important: You do not need to use the word "grievance" for your complaint to be legally treated as one. Under federal Medi-Cal regulations, if you express dissatisfaction — in writing or verbally — the plan must capture it as a grievance. They cannot talk you out of filing one.

§ 1374.30 | INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Independent Medical Review (IMR)

"An external decision the plan cannot override."

If your health plan denies, modifies, or delays a service on grounds of medical necessity, you have the right to request an Independent Medical Review (IMR) from the DMHC under Health & Safety Code § 1374.30.

An IMR is conducted by a independent medical reviewer — not your plan, not your plan's doctor. If the IMR determines the denied service is medically necessary, the plan must provide it. The IMR decision is binding.

When you can skip straight to IMR without filing a grievance first: If there is a serious threat to your health, you can request an IMR directly without exhausting the plan's internal grievance process. You do not have to wait 30 days.

How to request: Contact DMHC at 1-888-466-2219 or file at dmhc.ca.gov. It is free. There is no filing fee.

§ 1367 | TIMELY ACCESS

Your Right to Timely Access to Care

"Coverage on paper means nothing without access in practice."

Knox-Keene requires health plans to maintain provider networks that give members timely access to medically necessary care. This is codified in Health & Safety Code § 1367 and enforced through 28 CCR § 1300.67.2.2.

Specific timely access standards include:

  • Urgent care appointments: within 48 hours
  • Non-urgent primary care: within 10 business days
  • Non-urgent specialist care: within 15 business days
  • Mental health (non-physician): within 10 business days
  • Mental health follow-up: within 10 business days (SB 221)

Geographic Access: Plans must also ensure you can reach a primary care provider or hospital within 15 miles or 30 minutes of your home or workplace.

If medically necessary treatment is not available within the plan's network within these timeframes or distances, the plan must arrange out-of-network coverage at in-network cost sharing rates. They cannot charge you more because their own network failed to meet the legal standard.

§ 1368.04 | ENFORCEMENT

What Happens When They Violate the Law

"Administrative penalties. Civil liability. Criminal exposure."

Knox-Keene violations are not without consequence — even if the DMHC's individual complaint process is slow and frustrating. Under Health & Safety Code § 1368.04, the DMHC Director has authority to assess administrative penalties against health plans for violations of the grievance system requirements.

More significantly: a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act is a crime. Health plans and their executives can face criminal liability for deliberate non-compliance.

Civil remedies are also available. Members who suffer harm from Knox-Keene violations may have claims under California's Unfair Competition Law (Business & Professions Code § 17200) and other consumer protection statutes.

Small claims court is a viable avenue for individual members seeking compensation for specific documented violations — particularly when the plan's failure caused measurable harm or forced out-of-pocket expenses.

§ 1367.01 | OUT-OF-NETWORK REIMBURSEMENT

Out-of-Network Reimbursement Rights

"If your network failed you, the plan pays."

Under Health & Safety Code § 1367.01, when a Medi-Cal managed care plan cannot provide medically necessary services within its network — due to lack of available providers, geographic barriers, or timely access failures — the plan must cover those services out-of-network at no greater cost to the member than in-network services would require.

This means: if you were forced to go out-of-network because your plan's network was inadequate, inaccessible, or failed to respond in time, you are entitled to reimbursement. The plan's administrative failures do not become your financial liability.

Reimbursement requests should be documented in writing, submitted with supporting medical records, and tracked with certified mail or other delivery confirmation. If the plan fails to process your reimbursement claim within 30 days, that is an additional Knox-Keene violation.

APL 25-006 | TELEPHONE ACCESS

Your Right to Be Heard (Wait Times)

"No more endless hold music."

Under APL 25-006, Medi-Cal managed care plans must meet strict telephone responsiveness standards. This is a critical component of access to care.

Member Services: Average wait time must not exceed 10 minutes during normal business hours.

24/7 Triage: If you leave a message, a licensed professional must call you back within 30 minutes.

If you are routinely placed on hold for 20, 30, or 60 minutes, the plan is failing its regulatory benchmarks. Document wait times with screenshots of your call logs.

§ 1367.27 | DIRECTORY ACCURACY

The Accuracy Mandate (Ghost Networks)

"A directory full of ghosts is a violation of law."

Under Health & Safety Code § 1367.27, health plans are required to maintain accurate and up-to-date provider directories. This isn't just an administrative chore; it is a legal requirement designed to prevent "Ghost Networks."

Plans must verify the accuracy of their directory at least annually, and they must update their online directories at least weekly. If a directory contains incorrect addresses (like the "Ghost Office" at 1055 W. 7th St.) or lists providers who are not actually accepting patients, the plan is in violation.

Your Right: If you rely on an inaccurate directory and suffer financial harm or a delay in care, you can document the inaccuracy as a Knox-Keene violation. Accurate directories are the baseline for "Timely Access."

What To Do If Your Plan Violates Knox-Keene

Document Everything. Move In Writing. Know Your Timeline.

Step 1 — File a written grievance immediately. Do not rely on phone calls. Put your complaint in writing. Use certified mail with return receipt. Note the date and time you submit it. This starts the 30-day or 72-hour clock.

Step 2 — Invoke the 72-hour rule explicitly. If your situation involves imminent harm, state clearly in your grievance that you are invoking your rights under Health & Safety Code § 1368.01(b) and requesting expedited review. Use the statute number. Plans respond differently to members who know the law.

Step 3 — Document the silence. If the plan misses the 72-hour or 30-day deadline, document it. Screenshot. Save emails. Use USPS Informed Delivery to prove nothing arrived. A missed deadline is itself a violation and becomes part of your evidence record.

Step 4 — Request an Independent Medical Review. If your denial involves medical necessity, request an IMR from the DMHC immediately. It is free. It is binding. It bypasses the plan entirely.

Step 5 — Consider small claims court. For documented violations with measurable financial harm, California small claims court (limit: $12,500) is accessible without an attorney. The plan's violation of a specific statutory requirement is your cause of action.

The Knox-Keene Act gives you real legal weapons. The only question is whether you know how to use them.

Real-World Application

The investigation documented on this site — Case #26AVSC00192 — arose directly from an L.A. Care Health Plan failure to comply with Health & Safety Code § 1368.01(b). A 72-hour expedited hearing was requested under life-critical medical circumstances. The plan defaulted. The case is now in small claims court.

L.A. Care was already under a state-monitored corrective action plan at the time of this violation, following a $55 million settlement with DMHC and DHCS in October 2024 for systemic failures including 92,854 untimely prior authorizations and 67,000 unanswered grievances. The corrective actions they promised covered exactly the type of violation documented here.

Primary Sources:
2026 Knox-Keene Act — DMHC Official Text DHCS APL 21-011 — Grievance and Appeals Policy L.A. Care Settlement Agreement PDF — DMHC Enforcement